Saxton v. Judges of the Court of Common Pleas

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Saxton v. Judges of the Court of Common Pleas

131 A.3d 43, 634 Pa. 722, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 50, 2016 WL 280491

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 21, 2016·No. 150 EM 2015·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of January, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the *723 Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief is GRANTED to the extent it seeks mandamus relief. The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to dispose of Petitioner’s pending petition within 90 days.

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of January, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the *723 Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief is GRANTED to the extent it seeks mandamus relief. The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to dispose of Petitioner’s pending petition within 90 days.

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Saxton v. Judges of the Court of Common Pleas, 131 A.3d 43, 634 Pa. 722, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 50, 2016 WL 280491 (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

131 A.3d 43 (Saxton v. Judges of the Court of Common Pleas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.