Saxton ex rel. Saxton v. Ocean City

187 A. 650, 14 N.J. Misc. 825, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 249
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 23, 1936·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant seeks to have the venue in a local action changed from Camden county, where the plaintiffs reside, to Cape May county, where the accident occurred.

The action is to recover for personal injuries sustained on the boardwalk at Ocean City. Many municipal officers and employes will be necessary witnesses. The plaintiffs will be obliged to establish their case by calling a number of medical witnesses resident in Camden. Since the cost and inconvenience to the public must be considered, there is more than a mere inconvenience in requiring the defendant to appear in this suit at Camden, the county seat - of Camden county. Keeley v. Belmar, 97 N. J. L. 98; 116 Atl. Rep. 273; Hesselbrock v. Burlington County, 111 N. J. L. 177; 168 Atl. Rep. 45.

The venue should be changed to the county in which the cause of action arose. A rule to that effect may be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saxton ex rel. Saxton v. Ocean City, 187 A. 650, 14 N.J. Misc. 825, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 249 (N.J. 1936).

187 A. 650 (Saxton ex rel. Saxton v. Ocean City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hesselbrock v. County of Burlington
168 A. 45 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933)
Keeley v. Borough of Belmar
116 A. 273 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1922)