Saxon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Saxon v. State

745 So. 2d 1045, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14223, 1999 WL 974145

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 27, 1999

DocketNo. 99-2648

StatusPublished

This text of 745 So. 2d 1045 (Saxon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saxon v. State, 745 So. 2d 1045, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14223, 1999 WL 974145 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Shannon C. Saxon appeals the denial of his motion for “statutory jail credits.” Saxon alleges that the court records show that he did not receive all of the credit for time served in Escambia County prior to his sentencing.

[1046]*1046We find that Saxon’s motion and its reference to the attached Escambia County warrant present a facially sufficient claim. See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998). The Escambia County documents reference an August 14, 1998 arrest date as Saxon alleges, in addition to referencing the Palm Beach County cases at issue. Saxon’s claim is not conclusively refuted by the transcript that the trial court attached to its order.

See, e.g., Daily v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D949, - So.2d -, 1999 WL 212859 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr.7, 1999); Silverstein v. State, 654 So.2d 1040, 1041 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand. On remand, the trial court shall determine if Saxon is entitled to the additional 34 days credit at issue.

FARMER, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI