Saxon v. Ramirez

2017 NY Slip Op 7689, 155 A.D.3d 420, 62 N.Y.S.3d 805
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 2, 2017·No. 4885·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered January 11, 2017, which denied the motion of defendants Carine Darnell and Kevin T. Darnell for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action involving a four-car motor vehicle accident, the Darnell defendants failed to demonstrate their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The inconsistencies between the statements made to the police after the accident and the affidavit submitted by Kevin Darnell in support of the motion show that there are issues of fact as to the sequence of the collisions (see Passos v MTA Bus Co., 129 AD3d 481, 482-483 [1st Dept 2015]; Espinal v Volunteers of Am.-Greater N.Y., Inc., 121 AD3d 558, 559 [1st Dept 2014]).

Concur—Tom, J.P., Renwick, Mazzarelli, Oing and Singh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saxon v. Ramirez, 2017 NY Slip Op 7689, 155 A.D.3d 420, 62 N.Y.S.3d 805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 7689 (Saxon v. Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Espinal v. Volunteers of America-Greater New York, Inc.
121 A.D.3d 558 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Passos v. MTA Bus Co.
129 A.D.3d 481 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)