Saxlehner v. Neilsen

Second Circuit

Saxlehner v. Neilsen

91 F. 1004, 34 C.C.A. 690, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2099

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 5, 1899

DocketNo. 85

StatusPublished

This text of 91 F. 1004 (Saxlehner v. Neilsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saxlehner v. Neilsen, 91 F. 1004, 34 C.C.A. 690, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2099 (2d Cir. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The questions raised in this cause are substantially the same as in Saxlehner v. Eisner (decided herewith) 91 Fed. 536¡. The circuit court held that complainant had no exclusive right in this country to the name “Hunyadi,” in which conclusion we concur. The circuit court further granted an injunction against continued use of the red and blue labels, and an accounting for past infringements by the use of such labels. For reasons stated in the Eisner Case, the decree as to the labels is reversed, and cause remitted, with instructions to dismiss the bill, with costs of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The questions raised in this cause are substantially the same as in Saxlehner v. Eisner (decided herewith) 91 Fed. 536¡. The circuit court held that complainant had no exclusive right in this country to the name “Hunyadi,” in which conclusion we concur. The circuit court further granted an injunction against continued use of the red and blue labels, and an accounting for past infringements by the use of such labels. For reasons stated in the Eisner Case, the decree as to the labels is reversed, and cause remitted, with instructions to dismiss the bill, with costs of this appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 F. 1004, 34 C.C.A. 690, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saxlehner-v-neilsen-ca2-1899.