Saxe v. Concord Hotel
383 F.2d 455
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedSeptember 22, 1967
DocketNo. 31, Docket 31228
StatusPublished
This text of 383 F.2d 455 (Saxe v. Concord Hotel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Saxe v. Concord Hotel, 383 F.2d 455 (2d Cir. 1967).
Opinion
Appellant on argument concedes that there was no error in the trial judge’s charge. To prevail, appellant must establish that there were no facts showing negligence or from which an inference of negligence could have been drawn. The record discloses sufficient facts to justify submission to the jury. Its verdict should not be disturbed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
383 F.2d 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saxe-v-concord-hotel-ca2-1967.