Sax v. Postal Life Insurance
This text of 20 A.D.2d 601 (Sax v. Postal Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment affirmed, with $10 costs. We do not adopt the interpretation of the contract made at Special Term but hold merely that a triable issue is presented as to whether insured was a full-time employee within the contract definition. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 A.D.2d 601, 246 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sax-v-postal-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1963.