Sax Enterprises, Inc. v. William F. Usher and G. E. Shingledecker, as Trustees for Saxony Properties, Inc., Debtor

Fifth Circuit

Sax Enterprises, Inc. v. William F. Usher and G. E. Shingledecker, as Trustees for Saxony Properties, Inc., Debtor

327 F.2d 666

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 17, 1964

Docket20141

StatusPublished

This text of 327 F.2d 666 (Sax Enterprises, Inc. v. William F. Usher and G. E. Shingledecker, as Trustees for Saxony Properties, Inc., Debtor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sax Enterprises, Inc. v. William F. Usher and G. E. Shingledecker, as Trustees for Saxony Properties, Inc., Debtor, 327 F.2d 666 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

327 F.2d 666

SAX ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant,
v.
William F. USHER and G. E. Shingledecker, as Trustees for
Saxony Properties, Inc., Debtor, Appellees.

No. 20141.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 19, 1964, Rehearing Denied March 17, 1964.

W. G. Ward, Miami, Fla., Ward & Ward, Miami, Fla., of counsel for appellant.

George C. Bolles, George F. Gilleland, Bolles and Prunty, Richard M. Winokur, Miami, Fla., for trustees.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS1 and JONES, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

No prejudicial error appearing in the record of this cause, the order of the district court from which this appeal has been taken is

Affirmed.

1

Of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

327 F.2d 666

SAX ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant,
v.
William F. USHER and G. E. Shingledecker, as Trustees for
Saxony Properties, Inc., Debtor, Appellees.

No. 20141.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 19, 1964, Rehearing Denied March 17, 1964.

W. G. Ward, Miami, Fla., Ward & Ward, Miami, Fla., of counsel for appellant.

George C. Bolles, George F. Gilleland, Bolles and Prunty, Richard M. Winokur, Miami, Fla., for trustees.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS1 and JONES, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

No prejudicial error appearing in the record of this cause, the order of the district court from which this appeal has been taken is

Affirmed.

1

Of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

327 F.2d 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sax-enterprises-inc-v-william-f-usher-and-g-e-shingledecker-as-ca5-1964.