Sawyer v. Worcester

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2131

In Re: AVA MAUREEN SAWYER,

Debtor.

--------------------------

AVA MAUREEN SAWYER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DEAN S. WORCESTER,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

ESTATE OF PRESTON CONNER, SR.,

Creditor.

No. 09-2133

v. DEAN S. WORCESTER,

ESTATE OF PRESTON CONNER,

Movant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00431-LMB-IDD; 1:09-cv-00298-LMB-IDD; 07-13021-RGM)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 9, 2010

Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ava Maureen Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se. John David Griffin, Deborah Campbell Welsh, WINCHESTER LAW GROUP P.C., Winchester, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Ava Maureen Sawyer

seeks to appeal the district court’s orders affirming the

bankruptcy court’s orders overruling Sawyer’s objection to the

validity of the Appellee’s claim in her Chapter 13 proceeding

and denying her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Sawyer v.

Worcester, Nos. 1:09-cv-00431-LMB-IDD; 1:09-cv-00298-LMB-IDD;

07-13021-RGM (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 26, 2009 & entered Aug. 27,

2009; Aug. 31, 2009). The Appellees have filed a motion to

dismiss the appeals for failure to prosecute. We deny the

motion as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED