Sawyer v. Wood

18 Wend. 331
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1836
StatusPublished

This text of 18 Wend. 331 (Sawyer v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sawyer v. Wood, 18 Wend. 331 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1836).

Opinion

By the Court,

Cowen, J.

The statute cited is, that the clerk shall make return of the certiorari, annexing certain papers; the supreme court may compel a return; and “upon the same being made,” the like proceedings shall be had as if the cause had been commenced in that court, beginning where the proceedings ended in the court below. “ Upon the same being made,” means regularly made. It is of the nature of process that it cannot be returned so as to take effect previous to the return day. (Smith v. Bush, 2 Wendell, 279.) In this respect the statute has made no alteration. The statute cited relative to a certiorari to a justice from the common pleas, requires the justice to return within ten‘’days after the writ is served on him, (§ 177;) and § 180 authorizes immediate proceedings on the return being made. This depends on the peculiar provisions of the statute, which has thus expressly altered the effect of the process. It requires a return before the return day, if that lie beyond the ten days. Such a proceeding is anomalous. I remember no other case like it by statute or at common law. Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith & Stebbins v. Bush & Pomeroy
2 Wend. 279 (New York Supreme Court, 1829)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Wend. 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sawyer-v-wood-nysupct-1836.