Sawyer v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Sawyer v. State

867 So. 2d 402, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 98, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 261, 2004 WL 351467

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedFebruary 26, 2004

DocketNo. SC02-1672

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 867 So. 2d 402 (Sawyer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sawyer v. State, 867 So. 2d 402, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 98, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 261, 2004 WL 351467 (Fla. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision in Sawyer v. State, 819 So.2d 966 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), which certified conflict with the decision in Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Critchfield, 805 So.2d 1034 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), which we recently affirmed in Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Critchfield, 842 So.2d 782 (Fla.2003). We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We accept jurisdiction in this case, quash the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Critchfield.

It is so ordered.

[403]*403ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE,. CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision in Sawyer v. State, 819 So.2d 966 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), which certified conflict with the decision in Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Critchfield, 805 So.2d 1034 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), which we recently affirmed in Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Critchfield, 842 So.2d 782 (Fla.2003). We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We accept jurisdiction in this case, quash the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Critchfield.

It is so ordered.

[403]*403ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE,. CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

867 So. 2d 402, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 98, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 261, 2004 WL 351467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sawyer-v-state-fla-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack