Sawyer v. Sawyer

16 Ind. 213, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 95
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 1, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 Ind. 213 (Sawyer v. Sawyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sawyer v. Sawyer, 16 Ind. 213, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 95 (Ind. 1861).

Opinion

Per Ouriam.

Suit commenced by attachment. On the issuing of the writ, publication of the pendency of the attachment was made, and during its pendency the writ was levied on certain lands. There was judgment by default.

No motion was made below to set aside this judgment by default. Is this case one of a class that may form an exception to the rule of practice established on this subject? We do not decide, because we áre satisfied there is no error in the case.

We aie clear that under the code publication in attachment may be made before the writ is levied. 2 E.- S., § § 156, 157, p. 63; id. § 38, p. 35; Ind. Pr., pp. 153-510. No irregularity appears in the record of the proceedings.

The judgment is affirmed, with 1 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Little v. Christie
48 S.E. 89 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Ind. 213, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sawyer-v-sawyer-ind-1861.