Sawyer v. Potash Corp.
This text of 223 F. App'x 217 (Sawyer v. Potash Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
D’Anna Russo Sawyer appeals the district court’s order dismissing her action filed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001-1461 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Sawyer’s motion for stay and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sawyer v. Potash Corp., 417 F.Supp.2d 730 (E.D.N.C.2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
223 F. App'x 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sawyer-v-potash-corp-ca4-2007.