Sawyer v. Parrish

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sawyer v. Parrish

139 A.D.3d 429, 29 N.Y.S.3d 170

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 2016

Docket1052N 158034/13

StatusPublished

This text of 139 A.D.3d 429 (Sawyer v. Parrish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sawyer v. Parrish, 139 A.D.3d 429, 29 N.Y.S.3d 170 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered October 7, 2014, which found that reasonable attorneys’ fees to plaintiff for plaintiff’s efforts in pursuing payment under a promissory note following defendant’s default, and pursuing attorneys’ fees to which plaintiff was entitled pursuant to the provisions of the note, was $18,000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to preserve any objection to the award of attorneys fees by his acquiescence in the off-the-record hearing held by Supreme Court.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Andrias, Moskowitz and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered October 7, 2014, which found that reasonable attorneys’ fees to plaintiff for plaintiff’s efforts in pursuing payment under a promissory note following defendant’s default, and pursuing attorneys’ fees to which plaintiff was entitled pursuant to the provisions of the note, was $18,000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to preserve any objection to the award of attorneys fees by his acquiescence in the off-the-record hearing held by Supreme Court.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Andrias, Moskowitz and Kahn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 A.D.3d 429, 29 N.Y.S.3d 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sawyer-v-parrish-nyappdiv-2016.