Sawyer v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

323 S.E.2d 450, 71 N.C. App. 803, 1984 N.C. App. LEXIS 3988
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 18, 1984
DocketNo. 842SC247
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 323 S.E.2d 450 (Sawyer v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sawyer v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance, 323 S.E.2d 450, 71 N.C. App. 803, 1984 N.C. App. LEXIS 3988 (N.C. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

WEBB, Judge.

As a general rule, the failure of an insured to pay a premium by the due date results in a lapse of coverage as of the last day of the policy period. Klein v. Ins. Co., 289 N.C. 63, 220 S.E. 2d 595 (1975) and Cauley v. Ins. Co., 219 N.C. 398, 14 S.E. 2d 39 (1944). An insurer may by extensions or periods of grace extend it on any terms he chooses. In this case it is undisputed that the defendant extended a grace period on condition that it receive the premium payment within the grace period. When it did not receive the premium payment it had the right not to renew the policy retroactively. The defendant was not estopped by any course of dealings. All the payments on previous occasions had been received by it within the grace period. It was error not to enter judgment for the defendant.

The appellee argues that he sent one check to pay the premium on two policies and the defendant reinstated the coverage for one of them retroactively to 11 June 1981 but refused to so reinstate the policy on which this action is based. The appellee argues this is not consistent with good honorable business practices. We cannot enforce any business practice for the defendant. It had the right not to reinstate the plaintiff’s policy retroactively and we are bound by that right.

[805]*805We reverse and remand for a judgment consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

Judges Hedrick and Hill concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reddick v. Globe Life and Acc. Ins. Co.
575 So. 2d 207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
323 S.E.2d 450, 71 N.C. App. 803, 1984 N.C. App. LEXIS 3988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sawyer-v-north-carolina-farm-bureau-mutual-insurance-ncctapp-1984.