Sawyer v. Kochersperger

Supreme Court

Sawyer v. Kochersperger

170 U.S. 303, 18 S. Ct. 942, 42 L. Ed. 1046, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1546

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 1, 1897

Docket463

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 170 U.S. 303 (Sawyer v. Kochersperger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sawyer v. Kochersperger, 170 U.S. 303, 18 S. Ct. 942, 42 L. Ed. 1046, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1546 (1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice McKenna :

This was .a petition by Kochersperger, as county treasurer and collector of Cook County, Illinois, filed in the County Court of that county, against Elizabeth E. Sawyer and others seeking the collection of certain taxes. The case was removed into the Circuit Court of the United States, but improvidently, as it falls within the rule laid down in Tennessee v. Banks, 152 U. S. 454, notwithstanding the petition stated that defendants declined to pay on the ground thatithe law imposing-the taxes was in violation of the Constitution of the United States.

Decree reversed, and cause remanded to the Circuit Court vjith a direction to remand the case to the County Court of Cook County, the costs of this court and of the Circuit Court to be paid by plaintiffs in error.

These two cases' were argued with No. 464.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice McKenna :

This was .a petition by Kochersperger, as county treasurer and collector of Cook County, Illinois, filed in the County Court of that county, against Elizabeth E. Sawyer and others seeking the collection of certain taxes. The case was removed into the Circuit Court of the United States, but improvidently, as it falls within the rule laid down in Tennessee v. Banks, 152 U. S. 454, notwithstanding the petition stated that defendants declined to pay on the ground thatithe law imposing-the taxes was in violation of the Constitution of the United States.

Decree reversed, and cause remanded to the Circuit Court vjith a direction to remand the case to the County Court of Cook County, the costs of this court and of the Circuit Court to be paid by plaintiffs in error.

These two cases' were argued with No. 464.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 U.S. 303, 18 S. Ct. 942, 42 L. Ed. 1046, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sawyer-v-kochersperger-scotus-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack