Sawyer v. Fellows
6 N.H. 107
Opinion
We consider the taw as settled, that where the owners of adjoining lots agree to a particular line, as the dividing line between them, the agreement is conclusive against them, and all persons claiming under them. 2 Starkie’s Ev. 599; 4 Wheaton, 513, Boyd’s Lessee v. Graves; 2 Caine’s Rep. 197, Jackson v. Dysling; 12 Mass. Rep. 469, Makepeace v. Bancroft; 2 Johns. 224.
Judgment on the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sawyer v. Fellows, 6 N.H. 107 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1833).
6 N.H. 107 (Sawyer v. Fellows) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whitehouse v. Bickford
29 N.H. 471 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1854)
Carleton v. Redington
21 N.H. 291 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1850)
Wallace v. Goodall
18 N.H. 439 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1846)
Clough v. Bowman
15 N.H. 504 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1844)
Smith v. Bullock
16 Vt. 592 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1844)
Prescott v. Hawkins
12 N.H. 19 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1841)