Sawyer v. Eaton

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Sawyer v. Eaton

111 A. 925, 119 Me. 599, 1920 Me. LEXIS 127

DecidedNovember 26, 1920

StatusPublished

This text of 111 A. 925 (Sawyer v. Eaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sawyer v. Eaton, 111 A. 925, 119 Me. 599, 1920 Me. LEXIS 127 (Me. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an action in assumpsit on an account annexed. The defendant filed a [600]*600set-off. The evidence was fully and carefully presented on both sides. No exceptions upon points of law are presented. The issues are wholly issues of fact. Upon those issues the jury returned a verdict declaring that there is no balance due either party. The plaintiff presents a motion for a new trial. It is true that the testimony is conflicting but the jury, seeing and hearing the witnesses, passed upon their credibility and we are not persuaded that the verdict is wrong. Motion overruled.

George H. Morse, for plaintiff. Ryder & Simpson, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an action in assumpsit on an account annexed. The defendant filed a [600]*600set-off. The evidence was fully and carefully presented on both sides. No exceptions upon points of law are presented. The issues are wholly issues of fact. Upon those issues the jury returned a verdict declaring that there is no balance due either party. The plaintiff presents a motion for a new trial. It is true that the testimony is conflicting but the jury, seeing and hearing the witnesses, passed upon their credibility and we are not persuaded that the verdict is wrong. Motion overruled.

George H. Morse, for plaintiff. Ryder & Simpson, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A. 925, 119 Me. 599, 1920 Me. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sawyer-v-eaton-me-1920.