Sawyer v. Dollar

Supreme Court

Sawyer v. Dollar

344 U.S. 806, 73 S. Ct. 8

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 13, 1952·No. No. 5; No. 6·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

On writs of certiorari, 342 U. S. 875, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the cases are remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the proceedings upon the [807] ground that the cause is moot.

Attorney General McGranery and C. Dickerman Williams for Sawyer, Secretary of Commerce, et al., petitioners in No. 5. Arthur B. Dunne for petitioner in No. 6. Herman Phleger, Gregory A. Harrison, Moses Lasky, Edmund L. Jones and Howard Boyd for respondents. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Reported below: 89 U. S. App. D. C. 38, 190 F. 2d 623.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On writs of certiorari, 342 U. S. 875, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the cases are remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the proceedings upon the [807] ground that the cause is moot.

Attorney General McGranery and C. Dickerman Williams for Sawyer, Secretary of Commerce, et al., petitioners in No. 5. Arthur B. Dunne for petitioner in No. 6. Herman Phleger, Gregory A. Harrison, Moses Lasky, Edmund L. Jones and Howard Boyd for respondents. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Reported below: 89 U. S. App. D. C. 38, 190 F. 2d 623.

Sawyer v. Dollar, 344 U.S. 806, 73 S. Ct. 8 (1952).

Pincite

344 U.S. 806 (Sawyer v. Dollar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related