Sawyer v. Countz
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-20939 Conference Calendar
THOMAS C. SAWYER ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
THOMAS C. SAWYER JR.; HARRY L. JACKSON,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
MICHAEL COUNTZ ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-93-3913 - - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant Thomas C. Sawyer, #579557, appeals the district
court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). He contends that the district court
abused its discretion in dismissing his retaliation and denial-
of-access-to-the courts claims. We have reviewed the record, the
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-20939 - 2 -
district court’s opinion, and the brief on appeal, and find no
abuse of discretion. See Whittington v. Lynaugh, 842 F.2d 818,
819-21 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 840 (1988); Lewis v.
Casey, 116 S. Ct. 2174, 2179-80 (1996). The brief is not signed
by Harry Jackson and raises no issues relative to him.
Sawyer’s motion requesting the appointment of counsel on
behalf of himself and Jackson is DENIED. Jackson’s “Motion To
Amend Signature” is also DENIED.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sawyer v. Countz (Sawyer v. Countz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.