Sawyer v. County of San Luis Obispo
48 P.2d 35, 4 Cal. 2d 776
Opinion
D. F. SAWYER, Petitioner,
v.
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO (a Public Corporation) et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Robert H. Dunlap and George R. Larwill for Petitioner.
M. R. Van Wormer, District Attorney, for Respondents.
Memorandum
LANGDON, J.
[1] This petition for a writ of mandate presents a situation practically identical with that involved in the case of Southern California Roads Co. v. County of San Luis Obispo, L. A. No. 15142 (ante, p. 220 [48 PaCal.2d 34]), this day decided.
For the reasons therein stated, it is ordered that a writ of mandate issue as prayed.
Seawell, J., Waste, C.J., Preston, J., and Shenk, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sawyer v. County of San Luis Obispo, 48 P.2d 35, 4 Cal. 2d 776 (Cal. 1935).
48 P.2d 35 (Sawyer v. County of San Luis Obispo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Union Safe Deposit Bank v. City of Clovis
73 P.2d 242 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corp. v. City of San Buenaventura
62 P.2d 583 (California Supreme Court, 1936)
Hammond v. City of Burbank
59 P.2d 495 (California Supreme Court, 1936)
Thompson v. City of Compton
59 P.2d 505 (California Supreme Court, 1936)
Thompson v. City of La Mesa
50 P.2d 504 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)