Sawyer v. Badger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sawyer v. Badger

44 N.Y.S. 1129

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 12, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 44 N.Y.S. 1129 (Sawyer v. Badger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sawyer v. Badger, 44 N.Y.S. 1129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The rulings of the court upon the several exceptions to the admission and rejection of evidence were correct. The single question presented which requires examination is whether the findings of the trial judge were supported by the evidence. On careful consideration of all the testimony, we are ■of the opinion that the learned judge was justified in coming to the conclusion that the plaintiff failed to prove that the transfer in question was made with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud the creditors of Josephine M. Mack. The .judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The rulings of the court upon the several exceptions to the admission and rejection of evidence were correct. The single question presented which requires examination is whether the findings of the trial judge were supported by the evidence. On careful consideration of all the testimony, we are ■of the opinion that the learned judge was justified in coming to the conclusion that the plaintiff failed to prove that the transfer in question was made with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud the creditors of Josephine M. Mack. The .judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 N.Y.S. 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sawyer-v-badger-nyappdiv-1897.