Sawyer v. Alexander

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6151

RONALD JERRY SAWYER, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

S. ALEXANDER; T. GOODRICH; D. LIPSCONE; R. WALKER, Sergeant,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 96-6432

RONALD JERRY SAWYER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

S. ALEXANDER; T. GOODRICH; D. LIPSCONE; R. WALKER, Sergeant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-95-1105-CV-2, CA-95-1103-CV-2)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 30, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

No. 96-6151 affirmed and No. 96-6432 dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Jerry Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

3

PER CURIAM:

In No. 96-6151, Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis. We find that the denial of leave to appeal was not an abuse of discretion.

Williams v. Field, 394 F.2d 329 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 891 (1965). Accordingly, we affirm.

In No. 96-6432, Appellant appeals from the district court's order declining to rule on the motions he filed after filing his

appeal in No. 96-6151. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocu-

tory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 96-6151 - AFFIRMED

No. 96-6432 - DISMISSED