Sawtelle v. State
35 A. 1130, 67 N.H. 590
Opinion
In the matter of the petition of Sawtelle for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, the petition is ■ dismissed. There is no newly discovered evidence to warrant a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sawtelle v. State, 35 A. 1130, 67 N.H. 590 (N.H. 1891).
35 A. 1130 (Sawtelle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Etc. v. Montgomery Cir. Ct. Etc.
157 N.E.2d 577 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1959)
Alpaugh v. Alpaugh
37 A.2d 825 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Wolff v. Wolff
34 A.2d 150 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)
In Re Roberts
30 A.2d 900 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)
Campana v. Angelini
28 A.2d 223 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)
Wendt v. Bergen Savings Bank
25 A.2d 511 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)
Union National Bank v. Wilson
25 A.2d 450 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1942)
Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.
7 A.2d 737 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1939)
Miller v. Horowitz
191 A. 906 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1937)
Oppenheimer v. Harriman Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
85 F.2d 582 (Second Circuit, 1936)
Eckman v. Beihl
184 A. 430 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1936)
Vestry of Emmanuel Church v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
179 A. 164 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1935)
City of St. Louis v. Rossi
64 S.W.2d 600 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1933)
McCarthy v. Clancy
148 A. 551 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1930)
Menefee v. Oxnam
183 P. 379 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
In re the Estate of Nelson
74 A. 851 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1909)
Bosworth v. Rogers
82 F. 975 (Seventh Circuit, 1897)