Sawma v. State
136 A.D.2d 965, 525 N.Y.S.2d 163, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1310
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 29, 1988·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We agree with the Court of Claims that the proposed notice of claim lacks the appearance of merit (see, Court of Claims Act § 10 [6]); thus the court properly denied the motion to serve a late notice of claim. (Appeal from order of Court of Claims, McMahon, J.—late notice of claim.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sawma v. State, 136 A.D.2d 965, 525 N.Y.S.2d 163, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1310 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).
136 A.D.2d 965 (Sawma v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Buskirk v. State
303 A.D.2d 970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Martin J. Sawma v. Cesar A. Perales, as Commissioner of New York State Department of Social Services
895 F.2d 91 (Second Circuit, 1990)