Sawicki v. New Britain General Hospital
982 A.2d 645, 294 Conn. 901, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 480
Opinion
The petition by the defendant Mandell & Blau, M.D.’s, P.C., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn. App. 25 (AC 29597), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court incorrectly denied the plaintiffs motion to set aside the verdict based upon juror misconduct? If the answer is ‘yes,’ was the Appellate Court correct in ordering a new trial?”
PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sawicki v. New Britain General Hospital, 982 A.2d 645, 294 Conn. 901, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 480 (Colo. 2009).
982 A.2d 645 (Sawicki v. New Britain General Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sawicki v. New Britain General Hospital
29 A.3d 453 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)