Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Sawicki v. New Britain General Hospital

Sawicki v. New Britain General Hospital

982 A.2d 645, 294 Conn. 901, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 480
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedOctober 22, 2009
DocketSC 18479
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 982 A.2d 645 (Sawicki v. New Britain General Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sawicki v. New Britain General Hospital, 982 A.2d 645, 294 Conn. 901, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 480 (Colo. 2009).

Opinion

The petition by the defendant Mandell & Blau, M.D.’s, P.C., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn. App. 25 (AC 29597), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court incorrectly denied the plaintiffs motion to set aside the verdict based upon juror misconduct? If the answer is ‘yes,’ was the Appellate Court correct in ordering a new trial?”

PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sawicki v. New Britain General Hospital
29 A.3d 453 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
982 A.2d 645, 294 Conn. 901, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sawicki-v-new-britain-general-hospital-conn-2009.