Saweat Jintanont v. State
This text of Saweat Jintanont v. State (Saweat Jintanont v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed and Opinion Filed March 27, 2015
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01424-CR
SAWEAT JINTANONT, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12-45928-I
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright
Saweat Jintanont appeals his conviction, following the adjudication of his guilt, for
possession of 3,4-methylenedioxy methamphetamine in an amount less than one gram. See TEX.
HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.116(a), (b) (West 2010). The trial court assessed
punishment at six months’ confinement in a state jail facility. On appeal, appellant’s attorney
filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief
meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a
professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to
advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro
se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21
(Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree
the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably
support the appeal.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 131424F.U05
/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
‐2‐
Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
SAWEAT JINTANONT, Appellant Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-13-01424-CR V. F12-45928-I). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright], THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Myers and Brown participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered March 27, 2015.
‐3‐
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Saweat Jintanont v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saweat-jintanont-v-state-texapp-2015.