Sawada v. Potter
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1159
BRENDA SAWADA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General; REGINA EWING, Supervisor; LISA MILLER, Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00754-AMD)
Submitted: July 16, 2008 Decided: September 23, 2008
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Snider, Ari Taragin, Jeffery C. Taylor, Jason I. Weisbrot, Jacob Statman, SNIDER & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Brenda Sawada appeals the district court’s order denying
her motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f), and granting
Defendants-Appellees’ motion for summary judgment in this
employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the parties’
briefs and the joint appendix and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Sawada v. Potter, No. 1:06-cv-00754-AMD (D. Md. Feb. 9,
2007). We grant the motion to withdraw filed by one of Sawada’s
attorneys and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sawada v. Potter (Sawada v. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.