Savoy v. Commissioner

Fourth Circuit

Savoy v. Commissioner

589 F. App'x 187

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 20, 2015

DocketNo. 14-1901

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 589 F. App'x 187 (Savoy v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Savoy v. Commissioner, 589 F. App'x 187 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Scott Savoy appeals from the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s determination not to sustain the notice of levy with respect to Savoy’s 2007 income tax liability, granting Savoy relief from collection activity, and placing him in “currently not collectible” status. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Savoy v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, No. 12316-12L, 2014 WL 3928972 (U.S.T.C. Aug. 14, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Scott Savoy appeals from the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s determination not to sustain the notice of levy with respect to Savoy’s 2007 income tax liability, granting Savoy relief from collection activity, and placing him in “currently not collectible” status. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Savoy v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, No. 12316-12L, 2014 WL 3928972 (U.S.T.C. Aug. 14, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

589 F. App'x 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/savoy-v-commissioner-ca4-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack