Savone v. Crysteel Manufacturing, Inc.
225 A.D.2d 757, 639 N.Y.2d 958, 639 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3118
Opinion
Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the trial court’s charge on the duty to warn apprised the jury of the proper standard to be applied (see, Martin v Hacker, 83 NY2d 1, 8; Wolfgruber v Upjohn Co., 72 AD2d 59, 62, affd 52 NY2d 768; Opera v Hyva, Inc., 86 AD2d 373, 377; Rainbow v Elia Bldg. Co., 79 AD2d 287, affd 56 NY2d 550). Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Savone v. Crysteel Manufacturing, Inc., 225 A.D.2d 757, 639 N.Y.2d 958, 639 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 757 (Savone v. Crysteel Manufacturing, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. Hacker
628 N.E.2d 1308 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
Rainbow v. Albert Elia Building Co.
79 A.D.2d 287 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co.
72 A.D.2d 59 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co.
417 N.E.2d 1002 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Rainbow v. Albert Elia Building Co.
434 N.E.2d 1345 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Opera v. Hyva, Inc.
86 A.D.2d 373 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)