Savone v. Crysteel Manufacturing, Inc.
This text of 225 A.D.2d 757 (Savone v. Crysteel Manufacturing, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the trial court’s charge on the duty to warn apprised the jury of the proper standard to be applied (see, Martin v Hacker, 83 NY2d 1, 8; Wolfgruber v Upjohn Co., 72 AD2d 59, 62, affd 52 NY2d 768; Opera v Hyva, Inc., 86 AD2d 373, 377; Rainbow v Elia Bldg. Co., 79 AD2d 287, affd 56 NY2d 550). Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 A.D.2d 757, 639 N.Y.2d 958, 639 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/savone-v-crysteel-manufacturing-inc-nyappdiv-1996.