Savitz-Denbigh Co. v. Bigelow
140 A. 921, 104 N.J.L. 445, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 234
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Savitz-Denbigh Co. v. Bigelow, 140 A. 921, 104 N.J.L. 445, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 234 (N.J. 1928).
140 A. 921 (Savitz-Denbigh Co. v. Bigelow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Esso Standard Oil Co. v. North Bergen Twp.
141 A.2d 81 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)