Savings Bank of Utica v. Valley Plaza Associates, L.P.
This text of 255 A.D.2d 974 (Savings Bank of Utica v. Valley Plaza Associates, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: We note that there is a discrepancy between Supreme Court’s decision and the subsequent order. The court in its decision granted the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment against defendant Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A., as executor/trustee of the estate of Hugh J. Knapp, deceased (Chase Manhattan), and denied the cross motion of Chase Manhattan for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. The order, however, does not address that motion and cross motion. To the extent that the order conflicts with the decision, the decision controls (see, Matter of Edward V., 204 AD2d 1060, 1061). Thus, we modify the order accordingly. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Ark, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., and Fallon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 A.D.2d 974, 679 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/savings-bank-of-utica-v-valley-plaza-associates-lp-nyappdiv-1998.