Savine v. Savine-Rivas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Savine v. Savine-Rivas

274 A.D.2d 585, 715 N.Y.S.2d 847, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8327

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 31, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 274 A.D.2d 585 (Savine v. Savine-Rivas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Savine v. Savine-Rivas, 274 A.D.2d 585, 715 N.Y.S.2d 847, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8327 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Caroline Savine-Rivas appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Bogacz, J.), dated September 15, 1998, which, after a hearing, found, in effect, that she had committed a family offense within the meaning of Family Court Act § 812 and granted the petitioner an order of protection until September 15, 1999.

[586]*586Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Although the order of protection expired on September 15, 1999, the appeal from the Family Court’s determination that the appellant committed a family offense is not academic in light of the enduring consequences which may potentially flow from such an adjudication (see, Matter of Cutrone v Cutrone, 225 AD2d 767).

The Family Court’s determination that the appellant committed a family offense within the meaning of Family Court Act § 812 was supported by the weight of the evidence.

The appellant’s remaining contentions do not require reversal. Ritter, J. P., Santucci, S. Miller and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI