Savin Corp. v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Savin Corp. v. State

37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 290, 1984 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 47

CourtCourt of Claims of Illinois

DecidedDecember 6, 1984

DocketNo. 84-CC-1440

StatusPublished

This text of 37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 290 (Savin Corp. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Savin Corp. v. State, 37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 290, 1984 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 47 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Raucci, J.

This matter coming to be heard on the motion of the Respondent to dismiss the claim herein, due notice having been given and the Court being fully advised.

The record in this matter discloses that Claimant furnished a copying machine to the Department of Children and Family Services pursuant to a contract for Fiscal Year 1981. After that contract expired, DCFS continued to use the copying machine but no new contract was executed.

The Comptroller would have been unable to issue warrants in payment for the rental of this machine because no contract for the same was ever executed or filed with the Comptroller as mandated by law. Therefore, this Court is also unable to make an award on this claim.

It is hereby ordered that the motion of the Respondent be, and the same is, hereby granted and the claim herein is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raucci, J.

This matter coming to be heard on the motion of the Respondent to dismiss the claim herein, due notice having been given and the Court being fully advised.

The record in this matter discloses that Claimant furnished a copying machine to the Department of Children and Family Services pursuant to a contract for Fiscal Year 1981. After that contract expired, DCFS continued to use the copying machine but no new contract was executed.

The Comptroller would have been unable to issue warrants in payment for the rental of this machine because no contract for the same was ever executed or filed with the Comptroller as mandated by law. Therefore, this Court is also unable to make an award on this claim.

It is hereby ordered that the motion of the Respondent be, and the same is, hereby granted and the claim herein is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 290, 1984 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/savin-corp-v-state-ilclaimsct-1984.