Saviano v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Saviano v. State

34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 152, 1981 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 23

CourtCourt of Claims of Illinois

DecidedMay 8, 1981

DocketNo. 78-CC-1137

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 152 (Saviano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saviano v. State, 34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 152, 1981 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 23 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Roe, C. J.

This cause coming on to be heard on the motion of Respondent, due notice having been given, and the Court being fully advised;

This claim is for a refund of that portion of tax paid on the purchase of cigarettes at retail at some point or points in time during the period January 1, 1967, to December 1, 1971, which was held to have been improperly collected. Pursuant to an order of the Circuit Court of Cook County in the case of Dorothy Hradek v. Marshall Korshak, 66-CH-7491, funds were deposited in a financial institution which acted as a clearing house for refunding the money. Claimant was issued a check for his refund but it was never cashed. The funds held in trust by the financial institution were returned to the State treasury. Therefore Claimant was unable to seek reimbursement from the financial institution and filed in this Court.

Upon careful examination of the evidence it appears that this is a just claim and that money is owing to Claimant.

It is hereby ordered that Claimant be awarded the sum of $13.40 in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising out of this cause of action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roe, C. J.

This cause coming on to be heard on the motion of Respondent, due notice having been given, and the Court being fully advised;

This claim is for a refund of that portion of tax paid on the purchase of cigarettes at retail at some point or points in time during the period January 1, 1967, to December 1, 1971, which was held to have been improperly collected. Pursuant to an order of the Circuit Court of Cook County in the case of Dorothy Hradek v. Marshall Korshak, 66-CH-7491, funds were deposited in a financial institution which acted as a clearing house for refunding the money. Claimant was issued a check for his refund but it was never cashed. The funds held in trust by the financial institution were returned to the State treasury. Therefore Claimant was unable to seek reimbursement from the financial institution and filed in this Court.

Upon careful examination of the evidence it appears that this is a just claim and that money is owing to Claimant.

It is hereby ordered that Claimant be awarded the sum of $13.40 in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising out of this cause of action.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 152, 1981 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saviano-v-state-ilclaimsct-1981.