Savery v. Shelby

1931 OK 510, 2 P.2d 951, 151 Okla. 127, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 561
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 8, 1931·No. No 20733·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Logan county in an action wherein plaintiff in error was plaintiff. Plaintiff in error has served and filed his briefs in this cause as required by the rules of this court. The defendants in error have failed to file any brief or to offer any excuse for failure to do so. We have examined the brief of plaintiff in error, and the assignments of error are reasonably supported by the authorities cited therein. Under the oft-repeated holding of this court, we are not required to brief a case on behalf of defendant in error, or to search the record to find some reason why the judgment should be sustained. Home Savings Bank v. Oklahoma State Bank, 51 Okla. 368, 151 Pac. 1044; Love Motor Co. v. Croskell, 141 Okla. 139, 284 Pac. 297. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded for new trial.

Note. — See 2 R. C. L. 176; R. O. L. Perm. Supp. p. 360.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Savery v. Shelby, 1931 OK 510, 2 P.2d 951, 151 Okla. 127, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 561 (Okla. 1931).

1931 OK 510 (Savery v. Shelby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Love Motor Co. v. Croskell
1930 OK 55 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1930)
Home State Bank v. Oklahoma State Bank
1915 OK 676 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)