Save the Peaks Coalition v. United States Forest Service

691 F.3d 1151, 2012 WL 3765019, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 18350
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Save the Peaks Coalition v. United States Forest Service. Read the opinion of the Court — 669 F.3d 1025
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 28, 2012·No. 10-17896·Published

Opinions

Order; Dissent by

Judge WALLACE.

ORDER

Our order filed on June 21, 2012 (ECF No. 77) is hereby amended. All portions of the order, except the portion denying Intervenor-Defendanb-Appellee Arizona Snowbowl Resort Limited Partnership’s (Snowbowl) motion for attorney’s fees, are withdrawn, Snowbowl’s motion for costs is denied, and our referral of the order to the Appellate Commissioner is withdrawn.

In light of these amendments, Attorney Plaintiffs’/Appellants Save the Peaks Coalitions’ July 5, 2012 Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied, as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Save the Peaks Coalition v. United States Forest Service, 691 F.3d 1151, 2012 WL 3765019, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 18350 (9th Cir. 2012).

691 F.3d 1151 (Save the Peaks Coalition v. United States Forest Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related