Save Our Shore District v. New Jersey Redistricting Commission

619 A.2d 1005, 131 N.J. 159, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1344
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 7, 1992·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Plaintiff having filed a motion for direct certification, and the Court having considered the submissions of the parties and having heard oral argument on whether to grant the motion and on the merits of the issues set forth therein;

And the Court having determined in the public interest to expedite its disposition;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion for direct certification pursuant to Rule 2:12-2(a) (M-997) is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the motion for acceleration of the appeal (M-998) is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division, dismissing the Complaint, is hereby affirmed; and it is further

ORDERED that an opinion setting forth the reasoning of the Court shall issue in due course.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Save Our Shore District v. New Jersey Redistricting Commission, 619 A.2d 1005, 131 N.J. 159, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1344 (N.J. 1992).

619 A.2d 1005 (Save Our Shore District v. New Jersey Redistricting Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)