Save North Bay Village v. Arguelles

718 So. 2d 365, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12409, 1998 WL 670382
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 1, 1998·No. No. 98-2322·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the conclusion that the trial court correctly upheld the validity of the amendment to the North Bay Village City charter approved by the electorate on May 12, 1998, which clarified and arguably expanded an existing restriction on term limits for members of the City Commission, see Burdick v. Takushi 504 U.S. 428, 112 S.Ct. 2059, 119 L.Ed.2d 245 (1992); Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General — Limited Political Terms, 592 So.2d 225 (Fla.1991); Miami Heat Ltd. [366]*366Partnership v. Leahy, 682 So.2d 198 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Myers v. Hawkins, 362 So.2d 926, 934 n. 28 (Fla.1978), the judgment under review is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Save North Bay Village v. Arguelles, 718 So. 2d 365, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12409, 1998 WL 670382 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

718 So. 2d 365 (Save North Bay Village v. Arguelles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burdick v. Takushi
504 U.S. 428 (Supreme Court, 1992)
Miami Heat Ltd. Partnership v. Leahy
682 So. 2d 198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Myers v. Hawkins
362 So. 2d 926 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
Advisory Opinion to Atty. Gen.-Limited Political Terms
592 So. 2d 225 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)