Save North Bay Village v. Arguelles

718 So. 2d 365, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12409, 1998 WL 670382
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 1, 1998
DocketNo. 98-2322
StatusPublished

This text of 718 So. 2d 365 (Save North Bay Village v. Arguelles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Save North Bay Village v. Arguelles, 718 So. 2d 365, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12409, 1998 WL 670382 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the conclusion that the trial court correctly upheld the validity of the amendment to the North Bay Village City charter approved by the electorate on May 12, 1998, which clarified and arguably expanded an existing restriction on term limits for members of the City Commission, see Burdick v. Takushi 504 U.S. 428, 112 S.Ct. 2059, 119 L.Ed.2d 245 (1992); Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General — Limited Political Terms, 592 So.2d 225 (Fla.1991); Miami Heat Ltd. [366]*366Partnership v. Leahy, 682 So.2d 198 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Myers v. Hawkins, 362 So.2d 926, 934 n. 28 (Fla.1978), the judgment under review is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burdick v. Takushi
504 U.S. 428 (Supreme Court, 1992)
Miami Heat Ltd. Partnership v. Leahy
682 So. 2d 198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Myers v. Hawkins
362 So. 2d 926 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
Advisory Opinion to Atty. Gen.-Limited Political Terms
592 So. 2d 225 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
718 So. 2d 365, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12409, 1998 WL 670382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/save-north-bay-village-v-arguelles-fladistctapp-1998.