Savas v. Smith

606 So. 2d 515, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11421, 1992 WL 312756
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 30, 1992·No. No. 92-01036·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the trial court which dismissed the amended complaint filed by John Savas because Mr. Savas had not alleged, and could not by further amendment allege, a cause of action. See Quinn v. Stone, 259 So.2d 492 (Fla.1972); see also Duke v. Smith, 784 F.Supp. 865 (S.D.Fla.1992).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Savas v. Smith, 606 So. 2d 515, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11421, 1992 WL 312756 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

606 So. 2d 515 (Savas v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duke v. Smith
784 F. Supp. 865 (S.D. Florida, 1992)
Quinn v. Stone
259 So. 2d 492 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)