Savarese v. Fleckenstein
176 A. 332, 114 N.J.L. 275, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 229
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Case, Bodine, Donges, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 7.
For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Heher, Van Buskirk, JJ. 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Savarese v. Fleckenstein, 176 A. 332, 114 N.J.L. 275, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 229 (N.J. 1935).
176 A. 332 (Savarese v. Fleckenstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Orlik v. DeAlmeida
133 A.2d 55 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Kahn v. King Petroleum Corp.
80 A.2d 460 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)