Savarese v. Fleckenstein
176 A. 332, 114 N.J.L. 275, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 229
This text of 176 A. 332 (Savarese v. Fleckenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Savarese v. Fleckenstein, 176 A. 332, 114 N.J.L. 275, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 229 (N.J. 1935).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Case, Bodine, Donges, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 7.
For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Heher, Van Buskirk, JJ. 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Orlik v. DeAlmeida
133 A.2d 55 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Kahn v. King Petroleum Corp.
80 A.2d 460 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
176 A. 332, 114 N.J.L. 275, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/savarese-v-fleckenstein-nj-1935.