Savannah Warehouse & Compress Co. v. Hayes

111 S.E. 441, 28 Ga. App. 366, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 522
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Savannah Warehouse & Compress Co. v. Hayes. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 Ga. App. 356
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 9, 1922·No. 12976·Published

Opinion

Lube, J.

This case has been before this court before and is reported in 25 Ga. App. 356 (103 S. E. 270). The evidence for the plaintiff authorized a verdict in his favor, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. The assignments of error upon several excerpts from the charge of the court, when considered in connection with the entire charge and [367]*367the pleadings and evidence, show no harmful or reversible error. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Decided March 9, 1922. Rehearing denied April 11, 1922. Action for damages; from Chatham superior court — Judge Meldrim. October 4, 1921. O’Byrne, Hartridge & Wright, for plaintiff in error. Osborne, Lawrence & Abrahams, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodwoorth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Savannah Warehouse & Compress Co. v. Hayes, 111 S.E. 441, 28 Ga. App. 366, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 522 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

111 S.E. 441 (Savannah Warehouse & Compress Co. v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Savannah Warehouse & Compress Co. v. Hayes
103 S.E. 270 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)