Savannah Warehouse & Compress Co. v. Hayes

111 S.E. 441, 28 Ga. App. 366, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 522
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 9, 1922
Docket12976
StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E. 441 (Savannah Warehouse & Compress Co. v. Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Savannah Warehouse & Compress Co. v. Hayes, 111 S.E. 441, 28 Ga. App. 366, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 522 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Lube, J.

This case has been before this court before and is reported in 25 Ga. App. 356 (103 S. E. 270). The evidence for the plaintiff authorized a verdict in his favor, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. The assignments of error upon several excerpts from the charge of the court, when considered in connection with the entire charge and [367]*367the pleadings and evidence, show no harmful or reversible error. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Decided March 9, 1922. Rehearing denied April 11, 1922. Action for damages; from Chatham superior court — Judge Meldrim. October 4, 1921. O’Byrne, Hartridge & Wright, for plaintiff in error. Osborne, Lawrence & Abrahams, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodwoorth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Savannah Warehouse & Compress Co. v. Hayes
103 S.E. 270 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 S.E. 441, 28 Ga. App. 366, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/savannah-warehouse-compress-co-v-hayes-gactapp-1922.