Savannah & Statesboro Railway Co. v. Pughsley

39 S.E. 473, 113 Ga. 1012, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 458
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 20, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 39 S.E. 473 (Savannah & Statesboro Railway Co. v. Pughsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Savannah & Statesboro Railway Co. v. Pughsley, 39 S.E. 473, 113 Ga. 1012, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 458 (Ga. 1901).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

The evidence for the plaintiff, which was believed by the jury,, showing that a coemployee of the plaintiff was furnished with a defective tool by the master, with full notice to the latter of the defect, and that by rea-son of this defect and of the use of the defective tool by such coemployee the plaintiff, who neither had nor was chargeable with notice of the defect in the tool, was injured, a verdict finding the master liable for the injuries thus sustained will not, after its approval by the trial judge, be set aside by this court-as contrary to law and the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olson v. Kem Temple, Ancient Arabic Order
43 N.W.2d 385 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1950)
Swaim v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
187 Iowa 466 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1919)
Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. Holcombe
1916 OK 593 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 S.E. 473, 113 Ga. 1012, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/savannah-statesboro-railway-co-v-pughsley-ga-1901.