Savannah River Lumber Co. v. Smith

120 S.E. 41, 31 Ga. App. 119, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 767
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Savannah River Lumber Co. v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 Ga. App. 767
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 13, 1923·No. 14818·Published

Opinion

Bboyles, C. J.

The plaintiff having amended his petition to cure the defect pointed out by this court when the case was previously here (Savannah River Lumber Co. v. Smith, 28 Ga. App. 767, 113 S. E. 46), the court did not err in overruling the demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Savannah River Lumber Co. v. Smith, 120 S.E. 41, 31 Ga. App. 119, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 767 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

120 S.E. 41 (Savannah River Lumber Co. v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Savannah River Lumber Co. v. Smith
113 S.E. 46 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)