Savannah Kaolin Co. v. Travelers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Savannah Kaolin Co. v. Travelers Insurance

131 S.E. 919, 35 Ga. App. 24, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 537

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 13, 1926

Docket16397

StatusPublished

This text of 131 S.E. 919 (Savannah Kaolin Co. v. Travelers Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Savannah Kaolin Co. v. Travelers Insurance, 131 S.E. 919, 35 Ga. App. 24, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 537 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. A provision in an employer’s liability policy of insurance to the effect that the policy shall not apply to injuries sustained by any person employed by the insured “in violation of law as to age, or under the age of fourteen years if there is no legal age limit,” contemplates, when applied to an employment in Georgia, a violation of the terms of the Georgia child-labor act, which prohibits the employment of any person under fourteen years of age, except under named conditions. Ga. L. 1914, p. 88; Bark’s Ann. Code, § 3149(a). It does not contemplate merely a criminal violation of the act, which occurs only where the employer knowingly employs a person under the prohibited age. 36 C. J. 1088, § 64; Lockwood v. Ætna Life Ins. Co., 8 Ohio App. 444; Buffalo Steel Co. v. Ætna Life Ins. Co., 136 N. Y. Supp. 977 (4).

[25]*25Decided February 13, 1926. A. B. Bernstein, Mclntire, Walsh & Bernstein, for plaintiff. Harris, Harris & Popper, for defendant.

2. In a suit by the insured against the insurer upon such a policy, the verdict found for the defendant was authorized.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenlcins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

1. A provision in an employer’s liability policy of insurance to the effect that the policy shall not apply to injuries sustained by any person employed by the insured “in violation of law as to age, or under the age of fourteen years if there is no legal age limit,” contemplates, when applied to an employment in Georgia, a violation of the terms of the Georgia child-labor act, which prohibits the employment of any person under fourteen years of age, except under named conditions. Ga. L. 1914, p. 88; Bark’s Ann. Code, § 3149(a). It does not contemplate merely a criminal violation of the act, which occurs only where the employer knowingly employs a person under the prohibited age. 36 C. J. 1088, § 64; Lockwood v. Ætna Life Ins. Co., 8 Ohio App. 444; Buffalo Steel Co. v. Ætna Life Ins. Co., 136 N. Y. Supp. 977 (4).

[25]*25Decided February 13, 1926. A. B. Bernstein, Mclntire, Walsh & Bernstein, for plaintiff. Harris, Harris & Popper, for defendant.

2. In a suit by the insured against the insurer upon such a policy, the verdict found for the defendant was authorized.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenlcins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 S.E. 919, 35 Ga. App. 24, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/savannah-kaolin-co-v-travelers-insurance-gactapp-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack