Savannah College of Art & Design, Inc. v. Nulph

462 S.E.2d 812, 218 Ga. App. 799, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 3381, 1995 Ga. App. LEXIS 904
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Savannah College of Art & Design, Inc. v. Nulph. Read the opinion of the Court — 216 Ga. App. 48
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 24, 1995·No. A94A1920·Published

Opinion

Blackburn, Judge.

In Savannah College of Art &c. v. Nulph, 216 Ga. App. 48 (453 SE2d 80) (1994), we affirmed the trial court’s determination that the employer’s breach of the employment contract was substantive rather than procedural. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed our decision in Savannah College of Art &c. v. Nulph, 265 Ga. 662 (460 SE2d 792) (1995). Accordingly, our judgment in this case is vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court.

[800]*800Decided October 24, 1995. Drew, Eckl & Farnham, Arthur H. Glaser, J. Robb Cruser, for appellant. Jones, Boykin & Associates, Harold J. Cronk, for appellee.

Judgment reversed.

Birdsong, P. J., and Ruffin, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Savannah College of Art & Design, Inc. v. Nulph, 462 S.E.2d 812, 218 Ga. App. 799, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 3381, 1995 Ga. App. LEXIS 904 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995).

462 S.E.2d 812 (Savannah College of Art & Design, Inc. v. Nulph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Savannah College of Art & Design, Inc. v. Nulph
460 S.E.2d 792 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1995)
Savannah College of Art & Design, Inc. v. Nulph
453 S.E.2d 80 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)