Savaglio v. Hall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Savaglio v. Hall

32 A.D.2d 546, 300 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4255

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 546 (Savaglio v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Savaglio v. Hall, 32 A.D.2d 546, 300 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4255 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme on the law and the [547]*547facts, and new trial granted solely on the issue of damages, with one bill of costs jointly to appellants filing separate briefs to abide the event, unless plaintiff within 30 days after entry of the order hereon shall serve and file with the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict to $40,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the amount of the verdict was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme on the law and the [547]*547facts, and new trial granted solely on the issue of damages, with one bill of costs jointly to appellants filing separate briefs to abide the event, unless plaintiff within 30 days after entry of the order hereon shall serve and file with the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict to $40,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the amount of the verdict was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 546, 300 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/savaglio-v-hall-nyappdiv-1969.