Savage v. Stover

94 A. 1103, 87 N.J.L. 711, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 282
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 14, 1915·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review in this case will be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court in its opinion, except as to the observation, to the effect that in law there can he no identity as between an individual and a corporation. Upon the proposition thus generally stated we express no opinion.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chtee Justice, Garrison, Trench ard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Yredenburgit, White, Teritune, Heppenkeimer, Williams, JJ. 12.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Savage v. Stover, 94 A. 1103, 87 N.J.L. 711, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 282 (N.J. 1915).

94 A. 1103 (Savage v. Stover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neigel v. Seaboard Finance Co.
173 A.2d 300 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Coleman v. Newark Morning Ledger Co.
149 A.2d 193 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1959)
Trautwein v. Harbourt
123 A.2d 30 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)