Savage v. State

112 S.E. 523, 28 Ga. App. 543, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 670
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 9, 1922
Docket13354
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 112 S.E. 523 (Savage v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Savage v. State, 112 S.E. 523, 28 Ga. App. 543, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 670 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence adduced upon the trial of this case was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial was

error. Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Porter & Mebane, for plaintiff in error. James Maddox, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniels v. State
471 S.E.2d 560 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Neal v. State
204 S.E.2d 451 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Gee v. State
172 S.E.2d 480 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Thomas v. State
107 S.E.2d 687 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
State v. Flint
269 P. 476 (Utah Supreme Court, 1928)
Marshall v. State
127 S.E. 618 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 S.E. 523, 28 Ga. App. 543, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/savage-v-state-gactapp-1922.