Savage v. State
112 S.E. 523, 28 Ga. App. 543, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 670
Opinion
The evidence adduced upon the trial of this case was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial was
error. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Savage v. State, 112 S.E. 523, 28 Ga. App. 543, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 670 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
112 S.E. 523 (Savage v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Daniels v. State
471 S.E.2d 560 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Neal v. State
204 S.E.2d 451 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Gee v. State
172 S.E.2d 480 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Thomas v. State
107 S.E.2d 687 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
State v. Flint
269 P. 476 (Utah Supreme Court, 1928)
Marshall v. State
127 S.E. 618 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)