Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Savage v. Southern Railway Co.

Savage v. Southern Railway Co.

127 S.E. 160, 33 Ga. App. 564, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 595
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 1925
Docket16081
StatusPublished

This text of 127 S.E. 160 (Savage v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Savage v. Southern Railway Co., 127 S.E. 160, 33 Ga. App. 564, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 595 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Bloodworm, J.

The petition as amended did not set out a cause of action, and the demurrer thereto was properly sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur. G. N. Davie, 0. 8. Reid, D. D. Kenyon, for plaintiff. J. Q. Adams, Del. Qidllian, Gluorters & Wheeler, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 S.E. 160, 33 Ga. App. 564, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/savage-v-southern-railway-co-gactapp-1925.